My niece recently asked me via Facebook for help with her writing. Besides giving her advice, it prompted me to consider the usefulness of modern computers. The Internet is wonderful - information at our fingertips. But does it also create a situation where we have not learned to do "original research"? It's kinda like the situation in the '60's when the electronic calculator first came out.
The concern was whether people who became used to calculators would be able to do the math themselves. There is some merit to the concern. Like muscles, that must be used or they atrophy, the brain needs use and reinforcement to keep the neurological channels open. I used to be able to add and subtract in my head. I still can, but I find myself to be increasingly lazy - using a calculator when I don't really need it. What I sometimes do is add the numbers in my head, and then use the calculator to check my result. I must admit, however, that I do this less and less often.
So if I use the Internet for my research, am I getting all of the data, and the accurate data? Or am I overlooking information that I would find if I did the research myself? Someone had to create the information, and put it where it was computer accessible. Shouldn't I have to be one of those people, if I am to be truly critical and open minded?
This becomes even more important in the political sphere. If we depend on Glenn Beck or Keith Olberman for our information, are we getting the whole story? Should we be watching both? Neither? And if not, where do we go for accurate information?
Bottom line: Does modern technology represent progress?
No comments:
Post a Comment